Well just like I had heard the wording used in amendment #2 was very unclear. No doubt it was written to deceive people. As it ends up I now understand that they want to do everything but “implant” the clone in a human. Oh well ,thats not soooo bad?(sarcasm). Pastor Dan Walker of Full Life Community Church in St. Louis has a pretty good analysis of the amendment. Here
Also Michelle Malkin has “the dirt” on who is behind the issue pushing for the funding. As Jon The Baptist told me Jim Stowers who is the founder & CEO of American Century Investments runs The Stowers Institue and has put 29 million into the cause. And he already has a $300 million expansion project contingent on Amendment 2 passing. His 29 Million has gone into funding television, radio, print and billboard ads all over the state. Which is a little funny to me because the only billboards I see opposing Mr. Stowers are ones Morée makes for a friend Nancy Bass who operates them. POWER TO THE PEOPLE!!! Although don’t be surprised when you see them…lets just say they aren’t aesthetically pleasing. Morée would probably appreciate that I told you that its not up to her how they look. Thats pretty irrelevant when your trying to make a strong point I guess. Think: “Head on apply directly to the forehead.”











Vote No On Amendment 2- yes that’s what all the boards say.
Apply directly to the forehead. Who came up with that commercial anyway??! They should lose their job and be forced to listen to that thing for eternity. (or maybe just get a new profession) ugh!